Latest Entries »

Chapter Six


Jealousy

‘Jealousy is an ugly beast.  Anyone who has ever experienced jealousy or been on the receiving end of it knows how threatening it is.’ – Matik (2002)

What is jealousy?

Jealousy is the feeling or showing of envious resentment towards another individual due to their achievements, perceived advantages or possessions (Soanes and Stevenson, 2005)

Jealousy may be an expression of some other, repressed emotion such as insecurity, fear of rejection or abandonment, feeling inadequate or simply feeling left out.  It can also be an expression of territoriality or competitiveness (Easton and Hardy, 2009).

Pennell Rock (1983) describes jealousy as being ‘the eruption of attachment’.  By this he means the explosive nature of the sudden rush of emotions an individual feels when confronted with a situation that is seemingly beyond ones control, and that is potentially threatening to that individual’s Ego (the area of an individual’s mind that deals with the organization of reality, and one’s sense of self).

Benson (2008) too describes jealousy as a perceived ‘invincible monster’ of an emotion.  He says that jealousy is primarily rooted in fear; specifically fear of losing one’s partner.   He discusses the way in which some people with weak self-images sometimes ‘attach’ their own sense of identity to their primary partner, and so one can only imagine what the idea of loosing that partner can cause this individual to feel.

This suggests that in order to ‘remove’ the feeling of jealousy, one must first eradicate the low self esteem or self image that causes an individual to project their own self identity upon their primary partner.

What affect does it have upon individuals?

Within the context of a polyamorous relationship jealousy causes an individual to feel envious of another.  This feeling can take the form of rage, resentment, hurt, betrayal and self loathing (Easton and Hardy, 2009).  Jealousy is described in the context of a polyamorous relationship by Easton and Hardy (2009) as an ‘umbrella word’ that covers a plethora of negative emotions we may feel ‘when our partner makes a sexual connection with someone else’.  Jealousy has been blamed for a wide range of human actions ranging from bursting into tears right the way through to murder.  The way you act whilst being “influenced” by jealousy can push loved ones away and cause tremendous emotional damage to yourself and the others involved in the relationship (Matik, 2002).

What affect does it have upon relationship(s)?

Jealousy can have a tremendously destructive affect upon a person’s relationships.  As previously mentioned by Matik (2002) jealousy can drive those around you away, and is cited countless times as the reason for crimes such as assault, battery and murder.  On these occasions these crimes are labeled ‘crimes of passion’ by the law courts; examples of these types of crimes committed due to a sudden burst of jealousy can be traced back as far as humanity has existed.

This is the negative side of jealousy.  It is indeed a strong emotion and will be felt by all of us to a greater or lesser extent throughout our lives.  However, jealousy is just that, an emotion.  It is a way for an individual’s body to tell that person that there is something amiss within their lives: maybe they are indeed feeling insecure and unloved, this could manifest as feeling jealous towards their partner’s new lover (Easton and Hardy, 2008).  They could be feeling angered by a perceived threat from the introduction of a new individual into their already existing relationship; in this case the manifestation of jealousy as anger suggests that there is a problem with the underlying stability of the already established relationship (Veaux, 2007).

Jealousy need not be seen as only a destructive element within a relationship, but also as a potentially constructive component of it (Pennell Rock, 1983).  Jealousy allows one to spot weaknesses or insecurities within ones-self (and possibly ones partners too, although approaching this subject with them is best done extremely delicately) (Easton and Hardy, 2008).

How can one deal with jealousy?

Eastern and Hardy (2008) dedicate an entire chapter of The Ethical Slut: A Practical Guide to Polyamory, Open Relationships and Other Adventures to the sole question of how to deal with Jealousy; as do Taormino (2008) and Matik (2002).  Jealousy has dedicated sections in websites such as xeromag.com/fvpoly, polyamory.org, lovewithoutlimits.com and polyamorysociety.org.  It is not a small or insignificant issue within the polyamory community.

From this we can see that far from claiming that it is a myth and doesn’t exist, or is a product of a ‘weak mind and social conditioning’ as some would have us believe (Easton and Hardy, 2008); jealousy is an everyday reality.

That being said there are ways one can deal with jealousy.  Matik (2002) describes how she likes to channel her feelings of jealousy by keeping a journal, going out running and creating works of art.  She describes the very real need for jealousy to be confronted and channeled into positive actions, rather than being allowed to ‘feaster and stew’.  Jealousy is an emotion that grows larger and more powerful over time if not confronted, and it is this that Pennell Rock (1983) calls the ‘explosion’.  He describes the nature of jealousy as being one of defense; jealousy, he says is a way in which we can defend our ‘ego’.  In this way, Pennell Rock (1983), suggests, an individual can ‘work through’ their jealous feelings and ‘penetrate the core of their emotions’.

He likens jealousy to an onion: It is overwhelming, pungent and difficult to be near.  You can’t ignore it, he says, and it is likely to make you cry.  You cannot, however much you may wish to, deny that the onion is an important food source.  You cannot blame and control an onion in order to disguise it as something else, it will merely confuse you and make the effects of the onion that much more painful.  By doing this you are also denying the very existence of the onion.  The only way to truly see the onion for what it is, as uncomfortable as it may make you feel in the short term, is to embrace all aspects of the onion, and recognize it as a key part of your life (Pennell Rock, 1983).

This analogy demonstrates a few key points to consider when confronting jealousy, whether it be your own or someone else’s.  Jealousy is not an emotion that should be denied, controlled or “pushed under the rug”.  It is something that is very real, and has the potential to be devastating if ignored or deliberately mislabeled.  Neither is it something that should be ‘projected’ upon others, as this too mislabels it and masks its true identity.

Instead Pennell Rock (1983) suggests that jealousy should be seen for what it is; an uncomfortable, sometimes painful emotion, that is a signifier for the person who is experiencing the emotion, that something is making them uneasy, insecure or feel threatened.

How can one go about ‘accepting’ one’s own jealousy?  Is it, in reality, even possible?

The idea of facing and embracing your own jealous feelings, may well, in the abstract, sound like a great idea; however, faced with the intense emotional realities involved with actually doing this one may easily falter (Easton and Hardy, 2008).  Easton and Hardy (2008) describe a situation in which Easton first started to think about confronting her own jealousies.  They describe how she felt ‘an almost intolerable sense if insecurity’, and so one can see that facing jealousy down is not an easy process.

It is, however, a vital process if one is committed to living a polyamorous lifestyle; as one will be placed in a situation where your primary partner forms a relationship with someone other than yourself.  ‘If you cannot live with the idea of this’, Benson (2008) says ‘then maybe a polyamorous lifestyle is not best suited for you’.

Easton and Hardy (2008) assure the reader that if you can, imagine a scenario where you can find yourself accepting your primary partner with another person, and then it is possible to battle through your jealousy and find that happy ending.  The main thing to remember is ‘to give yourself permission to learn’.  They suggest that the individual allow themselves to make mistakes and to acknowledge that you have no choice if you wish to pursue this road.  They say to reassure oneself that there is no graceful way in which to ‘unlearn’ jealousy, and that it is similar to learning how to skate:

‘you have to fall down and make a fool of yourself a few times before you become graceful as a swan.’ Easton and Hardy,. 2008. p115.

In this analogy the reader is presented with a clear and motivating image: that of an ungraceful and clumsy skater (not someone anyone would desire to be) making mistakes but still persevering, and eventually becoming someone who is as ‘graceful as a swan’ (an image that most would find highly appealing).  By doing this Easton and Hardy (2008) have presented the reader a scenario in which it is not the jealousy (or in the case of the analogy the skating) that is in charge, but the person who is experiencing the jealousy (or the skater).  In this way they ‘disempower’ the jealousy and place the sphere of control squarely in the hands of the individual who chooses to tackle their jealousy.

This is a lesson that can also be applied to anyone in any form of relationship (Taormino, 2009) as jealousy can be a destructive emotion.  It is often, however, commonly accepted amongst monogamous couples as a “healthy” and “correct” emotion to feel when facing a scenario that could be construed as ‘dangerous to the status quo of the monogamous relationship’ (Easton and Hardy, 2008)

Next Chapter

Chapter Seven


Why are some people attracted to the idea of a polyamorous relationship, whilst others are not?

‘Not everyone is able to choose polyamory. Social conditioning aside, I’ve met many people who seem to be naturally predisposed to monogamy, and a few who seem permanently wired for it, just as I have seen many people who seem permanently wired to be poly.’ – Veaux (2009)

As this author has demonstrated there are lots of different facets to a polyamorous relationship.  The major one being that an individual can experience ‘multiple loving relationships at once’ without the need for or expectance of any form of deception (Taormino, 2008).  Having multiple sexual partners is not considered ‘cheating’ in a polyamorous relationship, if all other partners are informed and are comfortable with the existence of the others (Veaux, 2009).  This idea is approached from an ethical, spiritual or philosophical point of view.  ‘Cheating’ only occurs when one partner does not inform their other partner(s) of the existence of a new lover/emotionally intimate partner.  Or when an individual breaks one of the pre-established relationship rules (Veaux, 2009).  This differs from the monogamous idea of cheating, which is that of having more than one sexual partner, with or without the knowledge or consent of the primary partner (Taormino, 2008).

Monogamy also is has one other direct contrast to polyamory in that it is built upon the ‘scarcity’ model of love (Easton and Hardy, 2009, Taormino, 2008).  This is the idea that there is a limited supply of love, and that if an individual ‘falls in love with’ another individual, whilst being in a relationship with someone else, they must then choose who to love, because it is simply impossible for one person to love more than one other person at a time (Easton and Hardy, 2009, Taormino, 2008).  Polyamory practitioners, as previously mentioned, believe that an individual can love more than one person at once, indeed love is – theoretically – infinite.  The more people an individual loves, the more love there is in the world (Easton and Hardy, 2009, Taormino, 2008).  In practice, love is not infinite, it is bound by the restrictions of the amount of physical time any one person can give to all those they love, however, the possibility of infinite love is still philosophically present within the foundations of polyamory (Benson, 2008).

Polyamory embraces the ideas and ideals of personal choice, responsibility and freedom.  It turns the idea of another individual being ‘your other half’ into you being the only one who is responsible for your own happiness (Easton and Hardy, 2009).  This may appear bleak to some, and lacking in romance; as one of the cornerstone ideas of (mainstream, western) monogamy is that of finding ‘your perfect match’, that one person that will ‘complete you’.  Polyamory disavows this idea in favor of the philosophy that no one person can be expected to meet all of the needs of another, and instead allows for different needs to be met by numerous individuals, whether these needs be emotional, physical or spiritual (Easton and Hardy, 2009, Taormino, 2008, Benson, 2008, Matik, 2002, Veaux, 2009)

Polyamory also forces an individual to tackle head on the ideas of jealousy and personal responsibility.  These can be incredibly uncomfortable ideas and realities to grapple with, however they present the practitioner with an unparalleled chance at personal growth, and if tackled, greatly increased self esteem and sense of identity (Easton and Hardy, 2009).

This is something that can also be challenged and faced by an individual who is practicing monogamy too, however, these notions are not highly visible within discussions surrounding monogamy, and are not stressed as essential for the proper functioning of a monogamous relationship (Veaux, 2009).

Next Chapter

Conclusion.


From the literature reviewed this author has concluded that an individual who either seeks out a polyamorous relationship due to their own sexual nature or preference would be one who enjoys the idea of personal growth, choice, freedom and challenge.  They would be happy and comfortable with the idea of having multiple intimate partners, and being with these partners in a truly honest and open way.  They would be unsettled by keeping secrets from their partners and would never ‘cheat’ on them by secretly engaging in a relationship without sharing it with all the other individuals involved within the partnership.

Whilst an individual who would seek a monogamous relationship would not be comfortable with ‘sharing’ their sexual partner with anyone else either for personal, philosophical or spiritual reasons.  They would not be averse to the ideas of personal growth, freedom and challenge, but would be inclined to seek these out within the context of their already existing relationship.  They too would be unsettled by the idea of cheating; however their definition of this would be different from that of a polyamorous person: cheating would be regarded as having a sexual relationship outside of the primary partnership.

The idea that polyamory can encompass infidelity without betrayal is incorrect, as fidelity is central to the philosophy of polyamory.  It does, however, embrace the idea of having multiple loving partners without betrayal.

To the Bibliography

To the References

Bibliography


Anon,. 2010. Introduction to Polyamory, Polyamory.org.uk [online] Available at: http://www.polyamory.org.uk/polyamory_intro.html [accessed 04.04.2010]

Anon, 2010. What is Swinging [online] Available at: www.about-swinging.co.uk [accessed 04.04.2010]

Bennett, J. (2009). Only You. And You. And You. Polyamory—relationships with multiple, mutually consenting partners—has a coming-out party. [online]: Available at: http://www.newsweek.com/id/209164 [Accessed 04.04.2010]

Benson, 2008. The Polyamory Handbook: A Users Guide. Indiana: Author House

Block,. J. 2009. Open: Love Sex and Life in an Open Marriage.  Berkeley, CA: Seal Press

Easton and Hardy,. 2009. The Ethical Slut, A Practical Guide to Polyamory, Open Relationships and Other Adventures, 2nd eds. New York: Celestial Arts

Hutchins and Kaahumanu, eds., 1991.  Bi any other name: Bisexual people speak out.  New York: Alyson Books
Klesse,. 2007. The specter of promiscuity: gay male and bisexual non-monogamies and polyamories.  Hampshire: Ashgate Publishers Limited

Leader, D. (2005) The Times, Analyse this: Polyamory.  [online] Available at: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article378539.ece  [accessed] 23.03.2010

Leith,. W. 2006. The Observer, Welcome to the world of polyamory. [online]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2006/jul/09/familyandrelationships2 [accessed] 23.03.2010

Matthesen,. 2010. FAQ and How to F*** Up. [online] Available at: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/polyamory/faq/ [and] http://www.faqs.org/faqs/polyamory/faq-supplement/  [accessed 04.04.2010]

Matik, W,. 2002.  Redefining our Relationships. Oakland, CA: Defiant Times Press

Mehan III, (2010) The American Spectator, Cultures Monogamous and Polyamorous.  [online] Available at: http://spectator.org/archives/2010/01/08/cultures-monogamous-and-polyam/ [accessed] 23.03.2010

Nearing and Taj Anapol, (2010).  Loving More New Models for Relationships. [online]: Available at: http://www.lovemore.com/faq.php#wip [Accessed 04.04.2010]

Pennell Rock,. W. 1983. Jealousy and the Abyss, Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 23(2), pp70-84.

Plummer, K. 2003. Intimate Citizenship : Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Montreal: University Press

Soanes and Stevenson, eds., 2005. Oxford Dictionary of English.  Oxford: Oxford University Press

Taormino,. 2008. Opening Up, A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships. California: Cleis Press

Taj Anapol,. 2010. Love Without Limits: Mixed Marriages – Couples in Conflict:
When the Polyamory vs. Monogamy Debate Strikes Close to Home [online] Available at: http://www.lovewithoutlimits.com/articles/Polyamory_vs_Monogamy.html [accessed 04.04.2010]

Veaux,. 2009.  Polyamory? What Like Two Girlfriends? [online] Available at: http://www.xeromag.com/fvpoly.html#AnchorP1 [accessed 04.04.2010]

Veaux,. 2007. Polyamory? Thoughts on Jealousy.  [online] Available at: http://www.xeromag.com/fvpolyjealousy.html [accessed 05.04.2010]

References


Anon,. 2010. Introduction to Polyamory, Polyamory.org.uk [online] Available at: http://www.polyamory.org.uk/polyamory_intro.html [accessed 04.04.2010]

Anon, 2010. What is Swinging [online] Available at: www.about-swinging.co.uk [accessed 04.04.2010]

Bennett, J. (2009). Only You. And You. And You. Polyamory—relationships with multiple, mutually consenting partners—has a coming-out party. [online]: Available at: http://www.newsweek.com/id/209164 [Accessed 04.04.2010]

Benson, 2008. The Polyamory Handbook: A Users Guide. Indiana: Author House

Block,. J. 2009. Open: Love Sex and Life in an Open Marriage.  Berkeley, CA: Seal Press

Easton and Hardy,. 2009. The Ethical Slut, A Practical Guide to Polyamory, Open Relationships and Other Adventures, 2nd eds. New York: Celestial Arts

Hutchins and Kaahumanu, eds., 1991.  Bi any other name: Bisexual people speak out.  New York: Alyson Books
Klesse,. 2007. The specter of promiscuity: gay male and bisexual non-monogamies and polyamories.  Hampshire: Ashgate Publishers Limited

Leader, D. (2005) The Times, Analyse this: Polyamory.  [online] Available at: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article378539.ece  [accessed] 23.03.2010

Leith,. W. 2006. The Observer, Welcome to the world of polyamory. [online]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2006/jul/09/familyandrelationships2 [accessed] 23.03.2010

Matthesen,. 2010. FAQ and How to F*** Up. [online] Available at: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/polyamory/faq/ [and] http://www.faqs.org/faqs/polyamory/faq-supplement/  [accessed 04.04.2010]

Matik, W,. 2002.  Redefining our Relationships. Oakland, CA: Defiant Times Press

Mehan III, (2010) The American Spectator, Cultures Monogamous and Polyamorous.  [online] Available at: http://spectator.org/archives/2010/01/08/cultures-monogamous-and-polyam/ [accessed] 23.03.2010

Nearing and Taj Anapol, (2010).  Loving More New Models for Relationships. [online]: Available at: http://www.lovemore.com/faq.php#wip [Accessed 04.04.2010]

Pennell Rock,. W. 1983. Jealousy and the Abyss, Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 23(2), pp70-84.

Plummer, K. 2003. Intimate Citizenship : Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Montreal: University Press

Soanes and Stevenson, eds., 2005. Oxford Dictionary of English.  Oxford: Oxford University Press

Taormino,. 2008. Opening Up, A Guide to Creating and Sustaining Open Relationships. California: Cleis Press

Taj Anapol,. 2010. Love Without Limits: Mixed Marriages – Couples in Conflict:
When the Polyamory vs. Monogamy Debate Strikes Close to Home [online] Available at: http://www.lovewithoutlimits.com/articles/Polyamory_vs_Monogamy.html [accessed 04.04.2010]

Veaux,. 2009.  Polyamory? What Like Two Girlfriends? [online] Available at: http://www.xeromag.com/fvpoly.html#AnchorP1 [accessed 04.04.2010]

Veaux,. 2007. Polyamory? Thoughts on Jealousy.  [online] Available at: http://www.xeromag.com/fvpolyjealousy.html [accessed 05.04.2010]


R and A hugging.

My two wonderful friends R and A.  They are totally in love and are way too cute to be allowed.  As this is a blog celebrating everything pansexual, I give you my token heterosexual/normative friends!

More of these two to come, as they are both, (other than being ridiculously cute together) also sickeningly beautiful people, both physically and intellectually.

Hope you enjoy!  Any feedback is always welcome!

Beautiful Butterfly


Beautiful Butterfly

Another friend of mine, R.  More of her to come soon!


I had a *cough* discussion with my friend the other day about female stereotypes, and darn it, it’s had me thinking ever since.

My friend challenged one of my lesser known but deeply held stereotypical beliefs about females and the cinema: females do not go to the cinema alone, it just isn’t done.  My friend challenged this by dropping zir jaw and saying, and I quote “I can’t believe you just said that! You of all people.  I never thought I’d hear such a stereotype spouted by you.”

To which I eloquently replied, “Huh?”

Yeah, I totally won that battle.

But it got me thinking about stereotypes and how they influence who we are.

I had happily lived with the belief that women actually do not go to the cinema alone.  This had been re-enforced by the fact that every woman I had ever known did not go to the cinema by herself.  So when this belief was challenged by my friend, I think my brain actually shut off in self-defense, and I turned into some sort of instant replay machine, spouting verboten my Mother’s reasoning for not allowing her thirteen-year-old daughter to venture to the cinema alone.

And after hearing my Mother’s reasoning for not allowing me to the cinema I never thought any more of it.  I presumed it was one of those social conventions; like don’t wear your underwear outside of your clothing, (unless you happen to actually be a superhero, in which case you’re okay) or don’t eat yellow snow.  I placed it on the “duh, isn’t it obvious you don’t do that” scale of things in my mind.

Looking back now I can see that my Mother was just trying to keep me safe.  Yes, a thirteen-year-old girl shouldn’t really go to the cinema by herself nowadays.  It isn’t safe.  A grown woman on the other hand…well, maybe it’s okay for her to go alone.  She still may not want to go alone, (I certainly don’t, the idea of walking all alone into a cinema makes me shudder inside); but the reason for me not wanting to do that is not ‘women don’t do it’, it is ‘I don’t want to break an internal stereotype (that I know is wrong but is convenient for me to still believe in because it means I don’t have to face a socially awkward situation alone!’  (If that sounded slightly hysterical in your head, good; it does in mine too.))  But she has a choice.  She can choose to go with friends or by herself, she has the power to make that decision, the social convention does not have the power over her.

The idea of breaking a perceived social convention like that scares me half to death.  Other social conventions, I don’t give a damn about.  If you told me that ‘women are not allowed to kiss other women’ or ‘women are not allowed to play football (soccer for all you Americans out there)’ or even ‘women cannot participate in politics’ I would actually laugh at you.  These are all social conventions for a vast majority of the world’s population.  However, crucially, they are not my social conventions.  They are not my stereotypes.

I don’t believe that I have many stereotypes.  I consider myself to be so open-minded that there may actually be a revolving door fitted somewhere inside my head.  But I still do possess stereotypes.  I am, after all, human.  Everyone has them.  They allow us to function in whichever society we live in.  They have come about for a reason, whether that reason is right or wrong, stereotypes will always be there.  They act to guide us through identifying social norms and allowing us to ‘fit in’ with the crowd.  They are a great comfort to a lot of people.

They do, however, have a downside.  For those who do not conform to social norms, they can make life a misery.  When people are confronted by someone or something acting/saying/believing/being out of the ‘ordinary’ they do what I did at the beginning of this post; their brain shuts off and they revert to the ‘rules’ inside of their heads:

Boys don’t cry, girls wear dresses, men are strong, women love babies, I must be brave, you can’t do that, no one will hurt me, different is wrong.

These rules can kill.

Social stereotypes are there for a reason, I acknowledge that.  I also acknowledge that 100% of the human population possesses at least one stereotype to their name, whether they know it or not, it is there, buried deep.  Whether it be that giggly girls are stupid (I giggle, please be careful about how you word your answer *smirk*) or that men should always be brave, it is there, I assure you.  The stereotype is there, and it will be gendered, and it will be absolute, and it will be approved of by someone in your life at some point.

But is it automatically wrong because it is a stereotype?

Stereotypes have the potential to cause massive harm and distress; on the flip side they can provide comfort to many.  Does the fact that they have the mere potential to cause harm mean that every single stereotype should automatically be challenged every time anyone comes across one?  Should we sit down and ask ourselves why we believe what we do with regards to our own stereotypes?  Do they make us feel strong when we believe that we aren’t?  Do they give us comfort by allowing us to blend into the crowd?  Do they mean that we don’t have to confront our own fears?

I suppose a stereotype is rather like a tint that you voluntarily, but unconsciously place upon your glasses.  It colours how you perceive the world, and if it is not challenged, you will never know it is there.

However, if it is challenged then you become aware that the world does have other colours, and that you can see them if you so choose.  But, when it comes right down to it, the choice of taking off that tint is always down to the individual.  You can, like me, choose to acknowledge that you wear certain tints because it’s easier to see the world like that, rather than face a new, scary reality.  And that is okay.  It’s a personal choice, that has been made consciously.  Not every fear has to be faced.

But for those of you who are brave enough to remove the tints all together, there can be a world of possibilities out there.  You can strip away the layers over your glasses one by one.  Who knows, you may even find ‘reality’, if it exists, clean and unbiased, stripped of all social conventions and norms.

For the rest of the world, I think the best we can do is acknowledge that our world is coloured, that we are individuals, and that we have quirks, stereotypes and prejudices.  That when we are faced with someone elses idea of reality, it may be scary, it may be amusing, it may even be very, very confusing, but that it is not automatically wrong.

No one should be forced to believe anything (I think everyone can agree that BAD THINGS happen when one person tries to force a world view upon people who do not want it — look at every war… ever, for further details).  But neither should people be allowed to live in ignorance of the existence of options.

Choice is the key word here, I think.  People should be allowed to choose what they want to believe and what they don’t.  People should be educated in the possibilities of life, and the existence of ideas outside of  ‘the norm’.  People should be allowed to choose how they want to tint their glasses, if indeed they want to at all.  And that choice should be a conscious one.

DK Pride.


DK Pride.

DK in full pride regalia!

DK Sketch.


DK sketch.

I figured that if I am to keep this blog ‘authentic’ I should treat it rather like I would a sketchbook.  Put all my pieces in it and all my little thoughts and ideas.  So here is my first ‘sketch’, of my ever so handsome best friend DK.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.