Category: Writing


Here is why…

I hold my hands in the air, in the classic placating and yet defensive posture of those about to be robbed all across the land.

“Honestly I didn’t do anything to it…it just sort of died,” I mumble, whilst simultaneously trying to sound like I know what I’m talking about.

“But that’s the third one you’ve had in as many years,” my friend groaned at me.  “In the same amount of time I’ve managed to keep mine alive whilst it’s crossed continents.“  He takes an exasperated breath, and I look at the floor in mock shame.  “And didn’t you manage to blow up the power supply in one of your computers too?”

I look around nervously.  “That was the house, not me!”  I plead.  “The fuse went and then we sort of smelled smoke…why are you looking at me like that?”

He looks some more at me like that.  “I give up.  You want to Google 500gb hard drives, and this time try not to make it commit suicide.”

“Thanks!” I say, and head to Google the hell out of hard drives on my mother’s old dell.

“And don’t even think about killing your mother’s computer, you can’t afford to buy her another!”  He yells as I head up the stairs.

“Ha, ha!” I yell in reply.  But I do tip toe into the room, so as not to scare the old thing, and press the power button gently…well, you never know, it’s so old it might have evolved a consciousness.   Don’t look at me like that, it might.

So yeah, I have lost all access to anything technological.  My mother’s computer can just about manage to run Firefox, so long as you don’t do anything else with it at the same time.  Hopefully I will be able to get a new hard drive soon, fingers crossed!

Polyamory: ‘Infidelity Without Betrayal’?

Literature Review

26/7/2010

Sophie Clark

Introduction

From BBC Radio Four to The American Spectator, Polyamory – a word that was coined (arguably) a mere 20 years ago (Taormino, 2008, UK Polyamory, 2010) to describe a lifestyle that has been around for as long as humanity (Veaux, 2009) – has hit the news.  Polyamory has been described as ‘infidelity without betrayal’ (Leith, 2006); a lifestyle that means the individual is ‘unable to give up one crucial relationship in the past’ (Leader, 2005); and something that should spark a ‘culture war’ (Mehan III, 2010).  But who is right?  Are any of these notions of polyamory correct?

Next chapter

I had a *cough* discussion with my friend the other day about female stereotypes, and darn it, it’s had me thinking ever since.

My friend challenged one of my lesser known but deeply held stereotypical beliefs about females and the cinema: females do not go to the cinema alone, it just isn’t done.  My friend challenged this by dropping zir jaw and saying, and I quote “I can’t believe you just said that! You of all people.  I never thought I’d hear such a stereotype spouted by you.”

To which I eloquently replied, “Huh?”

Yeah, I totally won that battle.

But it got me thinking about stereotypes and how they influence who we are.

I had happily lived with the belief that women actually do not go to the cinema alone.  This had been re-enforced by the fact that every woman I had ever known did not go to the cinema by herself.  So when this belief was challenged by my friend, I think my brain actually shut off in self-defense, and I turned into some sort of instant replay machine, spouting verboten my Mother’s reasoning for not allowing her thirteen-year-old daughter to venture to the cinema alone.

And after hearing my Mother’s reasoning for not allowing me to the cinema I never thought any more of it.  I presumed it was one of those social conventions; like don’t wear your underwear outside of your clothing, (unless you happen to actually be a superhero, in which case you’re okay) or don’t eat yellow snow.  I placed it on the “duh, isn’t it obvious you don’t do that” scale of things in my mind.

Looking back now I can see that my Mother was just trying to keep me safe.  Yes, a thirteen-year-old girl shouldn’t really go to the cinema by herself nowadays.  It isn’t safe.  A grown woman on the other hand…well, maybe it’s okay for her to go alone.  She still may not want to go alone, (I certainly don’t, the idea of walking all alone into a cinema makes me shudder inside); but the reason for me not wanting to do that is not ‘women don’t do it’, it is ‘I don’t want to break an internal stereotype (that I know is wrong but is convenient for me to still believe in because it means I don’t have to face a socially awkward situation alone!’  (If that sounded slightly hysterical in your head, good; it does in mine too.))  But she has a choice.  She can choose to go with friends or by herself, she has the power to make that decision, the social convention does not have the power over her.

The idea of breaking a perceived social convention like that scares me half to death.  Other social conventions, I don’t give a damn about.  If you told me that ‘women are not allowed to kiss other women’ or ‘women are not allowed to play football (soccer for all you Americans out there)’ or even ‘women cannot participate in politics’ I would actually laugh at you.  These are all social conventions for a vast majority of the world’s population.  However, crucially, they are not my social conventions.  They are not my stereotypes.

I don’t believe that I have many stereotypes.  I consider myself to be so open-minded that there may actually be a revolving door fitted somewhere inside my head.  But I still do possess stereotypes.  I am, after all, human.  Everyone has them.  They allow us to function in whichever society we live in.  They have come about for a reason, whether that reason is right or wrong, stereotypes will always be there.  They act to guide us through identifying social norms and allowing us to ‘fit in’ with the crowd.  They are a great comfort to a lot of people.

They do, however, have a downside.  For those who do not conform to social norms, they can make life a misery.  When people are confronted by someone or something acting/saying/believing/being out of the ‘ordinary’ they do what I did at the beginning of this post; their brain shuts off and they revert to the ‘rules’ inside of their heads:

Boys don’t cry, girls wear dresses, men are strong, women love babies, I must be brave, you can’t do that, no one will hurt me, different is wrong.

These rules can kill.

Social stereotypes are there for a reason, I acknowledge that.  I also acknowledge that 100% of the human population possesses at least one stereotype to their name, whether they know it or not, it is there, buried deep.  Whether it be that giggly girls are stupid (I giggle, please be careful about how you word your answer *smirk*) or that men should always be brave, it is there, I assure you.  The stereotype is there, and it will be gendered, and it will be absolute, and it will be approved of by someone in your life at some point.

But is it automatically wrong because it is a stereotype?

Stereotypes have the potential to cause massive harm and distress; on the flip side they can provide comfort to many.  Does the fact that they have the mere potential to cause harm mean that every single stereotype should automatically be challenged every time anyone comes across one?  Should we sit down and ask ourselves why we believe what we do with regards to our own stereotypes?  Do they make us feel strong when we believe that we aren’t?  Do they give us comfort by allowing us to blend into the crowd?  Do they mean that we don’t have to confront our own fears?

I suppose a stereotype is rather like a tint that you voluntarily, but unconsciously place upon your glasses.  It colours how you perceive the world, and if it is not challenged, you will never know it is there.

However, if it is challenged then you become aware that the world does have other colours, and that you can see them if you so choose.  But, when it comes right down to it, the choice of taking off that tint is always down to the individual.  You can, like me, choose to acknowledge that you wear certain tints because it’s easier to see the world like that, rather than face a new, scary reality.  And that is okay.  It’s a personal choice, that has been made consciously.  Not every fear has to be faced.

But for those of you who are brave enough to remove the tints all together, there can be a world of possibilities out there.  You can strip away the layers over your glasses one by one.  Who knows, you may even find ‘reality’, if it exists, clean and unbiased, stripped of all social conventions and norms.

For the rest of the world, I think the best we can do is acknowledge that our world is coloured, that we are individuals, and that we have quirks, stereotypes and prejudices.  That when we are faced with someone elses idea of reality, it may be scary, it may be amusing, it may even be very, very confusing, but that it is not automatically wrong.

No one should be forced to believe anything (I think everyone can agree that BAD THINGS happen when one person tries to force a world view upon people who do not want it — look at every war… ever, for further details).  But neither should people be allowed to live in ignorance of the existence of options.

Choice is the key word here, I think.  People should be allowed to choose what they want to believe and what they don’t.  People should be educated in the possibilities of life, and the existence of ideas outside of  ‘the norm’.  People should be allowed to choose how they want to tint their glasses, if indeed they want to at all.  And that choice should be a conscious one.

This is a mini essay I penned a few months back.  I thought I’d include it here because it is still very relevant today, and hopefully people will find it interesting.  It will also give you a little clue as to how my brain works.

- – -

Lesbian, Transsexual, Butch;

Cis, Trans-Masculine, Polyamorous;

Transvestite, Pansexual, Straight;

Bi, Fag, Queer…

My life is orbited by flags and labels. I am surrounded by people who fall (from an outside perspective) neatly into categories. People that I dearly love, but sorely envy. They are people who can be seen for who they are, for what they feel and who they love.

They have an easy-to-identify box they can – if they so choose – fit into. A community they can belong to and a cause to battle for.

They have a flag to fly.

I am flagless. Don’t get me wrong, I have many labels of my own; starting from my gender expression, ranging right the way through sexual identity and exiting via my lifestyle choice.

None of which can be seen by ‘the outside world’. I am, on the surface, painfully hetro-normative.

I can express my gender in no other way than ‘female’. I am almost the epitome of cis-female; all curves and long hair, dainty feet and small artistic fingers. I embody the figure of Earth-Mother carvings that have been created across the entire globe; with my large breasts and outrageously rounded hips and backside, I practically scream ‘woman’ when I walk down the street. And yet I find myself yearning to be other than this. I am not comfortable in the skin I currently possess.

I see the butch (wo)men around me and envy their strong jaws and muscular shoulders; the way that they proudly wear their ass-kicker boots and hold their head high when they put on their navy jeans and leather jackets. These are attributes and traits that I covet on a daily basis, and which I can never possess, because I am not butch. I do not envy them for their gender expression, nor do I envy them for their silent air of masculine strength, I envy them for their congruency. I envy the way that they can match their inner self with their outer self-expression. I am a cis-gendered female, who is both pansexual and polyamorous, and who possesses a vehemently queer soul. And my soul is restless. It seeks identity, community and belonging: it seeks congruence with my outer expression, and more than anything else it desires a flag it can fly with a sense of honesty, whilst being surrounded by other souls it can call kin.

Now you might argue that there are one or two ‘labels’ listed above that are easily flag worthy, and you would be right; in fact I would go further and say that they should all have a flag, battle cry and political rally of their very own. Gender, sexuality and lifestyle are so sorely ignored and overlooked in western society that ignorance of any issue surrounding these topics is the norm, rather than the exception.

These are words that are spoken in places of secrecy and security, away from vulnerable ears and innocent minds. Children are not to be corrupted by terms such as ‘alternative gender expression’, ‘non-monogamous’ and ‘sexuality’. Even if those are the exact words that a growing human being needs to hear.

“Comfort and security are for the majority, not the minority, and never let it be any other way!”*

This was the very clear lesson I learned whilst I was at school. I taught myself about the ‘queer world’ that I felt so drawn to, but that I could never find a way to belong within. I looked too ‘normal’, spoke too correctly or was attracted to the wrong gender/s.

I tried out varying labels in the vain hope that one day one might fit, and finally found those terms that fell over my ample curves comfortably, like a second skin; only to look around and see that I was, once again, alone amongst the people I loved. I had found who I was, and the price I had to pay was to once again feel alone amongst my friends.

My labels didn’t come with easily waved flags. There were (and still are) no rally’s held by people declaring, “We are pansexual and proud!”

Polyamory didn’t (and still doesn’t) come with built-in laws that protect your job security like other ‘lifestyles’. When some time in your future your boss finds out that you have two partners and you somehow find that your working skills are ‘no longer required’, there is no one to call and help you fight against this discrimination. The polyamory flag is not big enough, not bright enough nor is it loud enough to be worthy of legal protection.

No one tells you when you are fifteen and forming ideas about how you want to live your life that there is any other way to be than monogamous and hetro-normative.

Queer is a word that you hear shouted as an insult, and never as an identity to be proud of.

So here I am: other. I am a queer soul trapped within a hetro-normative body, looking out at the world through pansexual eyes and yearning to live a polyamorous life.

I suppose I shall have to make my own flag, and learn how to fly the thing as high as my 5ft 2 inch stature can take it. Maybe this will make me strong, like those butch (wo)men I envy so much, and allow me to be brave enough to shout out like the gay, lesbian, bisexual and trans people who came before me, and march for the rights that I will need throughout my life. And maybe doing this will help my soul find its family, its community and its home.

Maybe by learning to fly my own flag, somehow, I will find ‘me’.

*A personal impression of life, not an actual quote.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.